Compliance Automation Platforms Compared: 2025 Guide
Comprehensive comparison of compliance automation platforms including Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, and ezGRC. Find the right solution for your organization.
title: "Compliance Automation Platforms Compared: 2025 Guide" description: "Comprehensive comparison of compliance automation platforms including Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, and ezGRC. Find the right solution for your organization." date: "2025-01-05" author: "Zeros and Ones Team" category: "Industry" tags: ["Compliance", "SOC 2", "ISO 27001", "GRC", "Comparison", "Vanta", "Drata"]
The compliance automation market has exploded. What was once a manual, spreadsheet-driven process can now be largely automated. But with multiple platforms competing for your business, how do you choose? This guide compares the major players to help you make an informed decision.
The Compliance Automation Landscape
Market Evolution
2018-2020: Early movers like Vanta pioneered automated evidence collection 2020-2022: Market expansion with Drata, Secureframe, and others 2023-2024: Feature convergence and pricing competition 2025: Maturation with focus on value and total cost of ownership
Core Capabilities (All Major Platforms)
All leading platforms now offer:
- Automated evidence collection
- Control monitoring
- Policy management
- Risk registers
- Vendor management
- Audit readiness dashboards
- Multiple framework support
The differentiation is in pricing, ease of use, and specific features.
Platform Comparison
Vanta
Overview: The original compliance automation platform, known for strong auditor relationships.
Strengths:
- Large auditor network
- Strong brand recognition
- Comprehensive features
- Many integrations
Considerations:
- Per-seat pricing escalates with team size
- Framework add-ons increase cost
- Annual contracts required
- Enterprise features gated
Best For: Well-funded companies prioritizing brand recognition and auditor relationships.
Pricing Model: Per-seat + framework add-ons
Drata
Overview: Strong competitor with good UI and comprehensive features.
Strengths:
- Clean user interface
- Good integration coverage
- Strong automation
- Active development
Considerations:
- Per-seat pricing model
- Annual contract requirements
- Framework costs add up
- Similar pricing to Vanta
Best For: Teams wanting modern UI with comprehensive features.
Pricing Model: Per-seat + framework add-ons
Secureframe
Overview: AI-focused compliance with modern approach.
Strengths:
- AI-assisted compliance
- Quick implementation
- Clean documentation
- Good customer support
Considerations:
- Per-seat pricing
- AI features still maturing
- Smaller auditor network
- Framework limitations
Best For: Teams wanting AI-first approach to compliance.
Pricing Model: Per-seat + framework add-ons
Sprinto
Overview: Fast-growing platform focused on speed to compliance.
Strengths:
- Competitive pricing
- Fast implementation
- Good for startups
- Responsive support
Considerations:
- Less enterprise presence
- Smaller auditor network
- Fewer integrations
- Limited customization
Best For: Early-stage startups needing quick, affordable SOC 2.
Pricing Model: Per-seat, generally lower than Vanta/Drata
ezGRC
Overview: Full-featured GRC with flat-rate pricing and all frameworks included.
Strengths:
- Flat-rate pricing (no per-seat fees)
- All frameworks included
- Self-hosting option
- Direct engineering support
- Predictable costs
Considerations:
- Smaller market presence
- Fewer native integrations
- Newer platform
Best For: Growing teams wanting predictable compliance costs.
Pricing Model: Flat-rate, all frameworks included
Pricing Comparison
Cost at Different Team Sizes
| Team Size | Vanta (Est.) | Drata (Est.) | Secureframe (Est.) | Sprinto (Est.) | ezGRC | |-----------|--------------|--------------|--------------------| ---------------|-------| | 25 employees | ~$15K/yr | ~$15K/yr | ~$12K/yr | ~$8K/yr | Flat | | 50 employees | ~$30K/yr | ~$30K/yr | ~$24K/yr | ~$15K/yr | Flat | | 100 employees | ~$60K/yr | ~$60K/yr | ~$48K/yr | ~$28K/yr | Flat | | 200 employees | ~$100K/yr | ~$100K/yr | ~$80K/yr | ~$50K/yr | Flat |
Estimates based on publicly available pricing and customer reports. Actual costs vary.
Additional Framework Costs
| Framework | Per-Seat Platforms | ezGRC | |-----------|-------------------|-------| | SOC 2 | Base price | Included | | ISO 27001 | +$$ | Included | | HIPAA | +$$ | Included | | GDPR | +$$ | Included | | PCI DSS | +$$ | Included | | SOX | +$$ | Included |
Feature Comparison
Evidence Collection
| Feature | Vanta | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto | ezGRC | |---------|-------|-------|-------------|---------|-------| | Cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Identity Providers | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | HR Systems | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Code Repos | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Endpoint Management | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Custom Integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Limited | ✓ |
Compliance Features
| Feature | Vanta | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto | ezGRC | |---------|-------|-------|-------------|---------|-------| | Policy Templates | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Risk Register | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Vendor Management | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Access Reviews | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Training Tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Audit Portal | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Enterprise Features
| Feature | Vanta | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto | ezGRC | |---------|-------|-------|-------------|---------|-------| | SSO | Enterprise | Enterprise | Enterprise | Paid | Included | | Custom Controls | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Limited | ✓ | | API Access | Enterprise | Enterprise | Enterprise | Limited | Included | | Self-Hosting | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | | Custom Frameworks | Enterprise | Enterprise | Enterprise | ✗ | Included |
Decision Framework
Choose Based on Your Stage
Seed/Series A (< 30 employees)
- Priority: Speed and simplicity
- Considerations: Many options work
- Recommendation: Compare pricing carefully, consider Sprinto or ezGRC
Series B/C (30-150 employees)
- Priority: Scaling without cost explosion
- Considerations: Per-seat costs start hurting
- Recommendation: Evaluate flat-rate options like ezGRC
Growth/Enterprise (150+ employees)
- Priority: Total cost of ownership, features
- Considerations: Enterprise features often needed
- Recommendation: Full evaluation of all options, consider TCO
Choose Based on Requirements
Need Self-Hosting? → ezGRC (only option)
Multiple Frameworks Needed? → Compare framework add-on costs vs. included options
Budget-Constrained? → Sprinto or ezGRC for better value
Brand Recognition Important? → Vanta or Drata
AI-First Approach? → Secureframe
Migration Considerations
Switching Costs
Moving between platforms involves:
- Evidence re-collection (automated) or import (manual)
- Policy migration
- Control remapping
- Team retraining
- Auditor notification
Migration Difficulty by Platform
| From/To | Vanta | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto | ezGRC | |---------|-------|-------|-------------|---------|-------| | Spreadsheets | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | Easy | | Vanta | — | Medium | Medium | Medium | Easy | | Drata | Medium | — | Medium | Medium | Easy | | Secureframe | Medium | Medium | — | Medium | Easy |
The Bottom Line
If Cost Predictability Matters
Choose ezGRC for flat-rate pricing that doesn't scale with headcount.
If Brand Recognition Matters
Choose Vanta or Drata for strong market presence.
If You're Early Stage
Choose Sprinto or ezGRC for competitive pricing.
If You Need Self-Hosting
Choose ezGRC (only option with self-hosting).
If You Want AI Features
Choose Secureframe for AI-first approach.
Evaluating compliance platforms? Try ezGRC free and see how flat-rate pricing can simplify your compliance budget.